WordPress database error: [You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '))' at line 1]
SELECT p2l.post_id AS original_post_id, p.ID AS translation_post_id, p.comment_count AS translation_comments, u.display_name AS translation_post_author, p.post_date AS translation_date, p2l2.language_id AS translation_language_id, s.summary_id, s.language_id AS summary_language_id, s.summary FROM wp_post2lang AS p2l LEFT JOIN wp_post2lang AS p2l2 ON (p2l.translation_group = p2l2.translation_group AND p2l.translation_group != 0 AND p2l.language_id != p2l2.language_id) LEFT JOIN wp_posts AS p ON p2l2.post_id = p.ID LEFT JOIN wp_users AS u ON u.ID = p.post_author LEFT JOIN wp_summaries AS s ON p2l.summary_group = s.summary_group WHERE p2l.post_id IN (278,339,279,355,253) AND (s.language_id IS NULL OR s.language_id IN ())

21.02.2008

Keine Markenregistrierung Aomori in China

Posted in Trademarks, China, Japan at 7:55 am by TMSJ

Das chinesische Markenamt hat die Registrierung der Marke Aomori (geschrieben in Kanji) für Früchte und eine Reihe von anderen Agrarprodukten abgelehnt.

Die Präfektur Aomori ist die nördlichste der japanischen Insel Honshu und berühmt für ihre Agrarprodukte, insbesondere für Äpfel.

Nachdem die lokale Regierung der Präfektur Aomori von der Einreichung der Markenanmeldung einer chinesischen Firma erfahren hatte, reichte sie zusammen mit 23 industriellen Gruppen der Region eine Beschwerde gegen die Registrierung ein. Die Vertreter der Präfektur Aomori befürchteten, die Eintragung werde zu einem faktischen Verkaufsstopp der nicht nur in Japan berühmten und hoch angesehenen Aomori-Produkte auf dem chinesischen Markt führen. Wenn chinesische Produkte den Label Aomori trügen, könne man von vornherein von einem Verkaufsschlager ausgehen, so die Vertreter der Präfektur.

Das Markenamt lehnte die Registrierung der Marke Aomori mit dem Hinweis ab, dass Ortsangaben, die in China landläufig bekannt sind, nicht als Marken registriert werden dürfen.

Quelle: Yomiuri Shimbun

20.02.2008

No Aomori Trademark Registration in China

Posted in Trademarks, China, Japan at 11:00 am by TMSJ

The Chinese Trademark Office (CTMO) has refused the application for the trademark registration of “Aomori” (written in kanji characters) for fruit and several other categories of products.

The prefecture of Aomori is the northernmost prefecture on the Japanese island of Honshu and is famous for its agricultural products, apples in particular.

After learning that a Chinese company filed an application for the trademark Aomori in 2002, the Aomori prefectural government — together with 23 industrial groups of the prefecture — filed a complaint against it. The prefectural government was afraid that a registration of the trademark Aomori would lead to a ban of agricultural products from Aomori which, not only in Japan, are highly respected and recognized.

The CTMO refused the registration arguing that names of places which are commonly known in China cannot be registered as a trademark.

Source: Yomiuri Shimbun

No Aomori Trademark Registration in China

Posted in Trademarks, China, Japan at 10:56 am by TMSJ

The Chinese Trademark Office (CTMO) has refused the application for the trademark registration of “Aomori” (written in kanji characters) for fruit and several other categories of products.

The prefecture of Aomori is the northernmost prefecture on the Japanese island of Honshu and is famous for its agricultural products, apples in particular.

After learning that a Chinese company filed an application for the trademark Aomori in 2002, the Aomori prefectural government — together with 23 industrial groups of the prefecture — filed a complaint against it. The prefectural government was afraid that a registration of the trademark Aomori would lead to a ban of agricultural products from Aomori which, not only in Japan, are highly respected and recognized.

The CTMO refused the registration arguing that names of places which are commonly known in China cannot be registered as a trademark.

Source: Yomiuri Shimbun

14.11.2007

Danone Joint Venture Group Withdraws Lawsuit Against China Trade Mark Office

Posted in Trademarks, Courts and Cases, China at 22:01 pm by TMSJ

There has been a surprinsing development in the lawsuit filed by Wahaha Food Co. (a joint venture formed by the French dairy maker Danone and the Chinese Hangzhou Wahaha Group) against the Chinese Trade Mark Office (CTMO):
A spokesman of Ogilvy & Mather, a public relations company representing Groupe Danone SA in China, told Shanghai Daily last week that the joint venture group has withdrawn the lawsuit against the CTMO. “During the legal process, we believe the facts around the written reply from the state trademark office have been clarified”.

Earlier on, it had been reported by Chinese media that Danone had had no choice than to drop the case against the CTMO as they seemed to have missed a filing deadline.

The MIP reports, however — under references close to the litigation — that the case was dropped because the Joint Venture Group had already obtained its main objective, namely a formal confirmation by the CTMO that Wahaha had not even attempted to transfer the trademarks in question to the Danone Joint Venture Group — which would be a serious breach of the joint venture agreement.

Danone Joint Venture Group Withdraws Lawsuit Against China Trade Mark Office

Posted in Trademarks, Courts and Cases, China at 22:00 pm by TMSJ

There has been a surprinsing development in the lawsuit filed by Wahaha Food Co. (a joint venture formed by the French dairy maker Danone and the Chinese Hangzhou Wahaha Group) against the Chinese Trade Mark Office (CTMO):
A spokesman of Ogilvy & Mather, a public relations company representing Groupe Danone SA in China, told Shanghai Daily last week that the joint venture group has withdrawn the lawsuit against the CTMO. “During the legal process, we believe the facts around the written reply from the state trademark office have been clarified”.

Earlier on, it had been reported by Chinese media that Danone had had no choice than to drop the case against the CTMO as they seemed to have missed a filing deadline.

The MIP reports, however — under references close to the litigation — that the case was dropped because the Joint Venture Group had already obtained its main objective, namely a formal confirmation by the CTMO that Wahaha had not even attempted to transfer the trademarks in question to the Danone Joint Venture Group — which would be a serious breach of the joint venture agreement.

« Previous entries